Category Archives: MOOC

CourseMaster, edX, and my LMS Wishlists

Coursemaster

On Friday, I had the chance to talk with Daniel McKelvey (VP of Business Development at CourseMaster).  CourseMaster is positioning itself as an edX service provider. edX is open source, so those with both the technical resources and the inclination can download and install their own instance of the software. Alternatively, organizations can turn to a third party like CourseMaster.

In our conversation, Daniel positioned CourseMaster as having three distinct advantages (i.e. elements added by the company):

  1. LMS core (branded, fully serviced and supported)
  2. Faculty dashboard
  3. Social collaboration and gamification

Support is for both faculty and students.

The business model is based on users (defined as interacting with 20% of course content) and duration of the course.

This looks interesting, and I intend to investigate further. Working on getting some colleagues to collaborate on a pilot.

The faculty dashboard and collaboration modules are what I am most interested in. Currently, Learning Management Systems are still pretty much Web 1.0. Most educators use the LMS as a publishing platform, and student interaction gravitates towards discussion, quizzes, and the uploading of files. Hopefully we will soon see Learning Management Systems approach Web 2.0 interactivity.

For example, services like Doodle allow me to quickly (and automatically) negotiate the best time for a group of colleagues to meet. Imagine if a LMS allowed for that type of automated decision making for the composition of student groups (based upon skillset, timezone preference, and/or project preference).  Affordances like this are what is needed in a LMS, particularly as we see increasing time demands on both students and faculty. I still have yet to see true collaboration tools built into the leading LMS providers that come close to the power of Google Docs, Skype, or Facebook. WordPress is a model that I would like to see Learning Management Systems follow here, where you could browse for plugins that add the collaboration functionality you need (that being said, WordPress  can be used as a LMS).

A Visit to edX

edX

At edX

I was lucky enough to visit edX last week. This is going to spur me into investigating their technology a little deeper. Johannes Heinlein provided a very helpful overview of where edX is now. Personally, I find it very interesting that Google is now onboard. edX might have the potential to supplant Moodle.

Anyway, Jeff Cattel (from CLN) sent us all a photo from the day…

Adobe Seminar (Exploring Creative Cloud for Enterprise)

Adobe Pen and Book

Adobe Swag

I attended the Adobe Seminar (Exploring Creative Cloud for Enterprise) this morning. At the event I and a colleague asked these two questions:

  1. Where can faculty (who may be intimidated by the Adobe resources for creative professionals) get documentation on how to use the Creative Cloud programs? i.e. Where can you get info on the fundamentals?
  2. Where can faculty get and see examples of best practice in education using the Creative Cloud programs?


The answer to question one was:

https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/learn/tutorials.html
(and click on Fundamentals)

The answer to question two was:

http://edex.adobe.com
Adobe Education Exchange. Membership is free, but needs an Adobe ID.

Adobe Education Exchange also has a series of MOOCs (providing a certificate) that train educators in the various tools. This is something I highly recommend. I plan on enrolling when I have time…

Brief Notes

I jotted down some brief notes from the seminar, which I share here…

The focus of the morning was on Adobe Creative Cloud, but Adobe Marketing Cloud was mentioned in passing (analytics, social, media optimization, targeting, etc.). I have not looked at this in the past, but should do so soon.

Adobe Creative Cloud was positioned as being good value to the user, with upgrades being released more frequently,  instead of the traditional release cycle. Somewhat ironically, we could see some updates being applied to one of the presenters’ machine during the keynote

Photoshop

Photoshop warping was demonstrated by Rick Borstein, which allowed for some very clever manipulations of images. Not something I will most likely use, but fun to watch in action. Linking was more likely, which allowed for non-destructive changes. We saw a Camera RAW filter in action, then some 3D Modeling in which 3D files were grabbed from another application, manipulated, with then the option to export directly to Shapeways, print to one of the MakerBot 3D printers, or save as an STL file.

Illustrator

Corner editing applied to multiple assets simultaneously was shown in Illustrator, along with a new pencil tool which used fidelity settings. We saw a perspective view which now allowed for the moving of station points, and non-destructive editing of text, then free transformations.  Brushes are now easier to work with, and images can be used as a brush.

InDesign

Most of the Adobe products have a dark (black) interface and background, but in InDesign now allows the user to change interface, so that things look a little more upbeat. The program is now able to work with right to left scripts (i.e. Arabic script). Fonts have improved search options/filtering (search entire name) with the option to favorite up to ten fonts. With hyperlinks, the character styles are automatically applied, and InDesign validates that URL is correct. Impressively  it can create QR codes natively – with subtle effect like change colour and scale (this I liked). You can also save InDesign files as older versions (to work with collaborators on older versions of software),  but some options may not be editable.

Making the Mobile Web Work

Andrew Trice (Technical Creative Cloud Evangelist), then spoke about “Making the Mobile Web Work.” He started off with some demonstrations of sites not working well on mobile devices, or sites expecting users to change behavior (i.e. the orientation of their iPad). He then showed mobile designed sites which looked truly awful on desktop machines (huge buttons and text). He was of the opinion that touch targets get very hard on smartphones if you have to keep on zooming in and out (to which I am in agreement) – this is not an optimal experience….

Muse

Muse was was earlier described by Rick Borstein as being InDesign for the Web, with the option to create animations in  HTML 5.

Andrew explained that Muse was designed from the same team that worked on InDesign, so the design metaphors were similar. For an InDesign user, Muse would be intuitive and familiar. Muse has an extensive choice of fonts, but can rely on web-safe fonts. Integration with Adobe Web fonts is possible.

Muse can publish as HTML, or export into Dreamweaver.

Responsive Design

Andrew positioned Responsive Design as taking two paths:

  1. Create a dedicated version for each device/platform (i.e. site optimized for desktop, another site optimized for mobile)
  2. CSS rendering on-the-fly.

Muse can export HTML for each supported platform, and follows approach #1.

Andrew then recommended Adobe Generator for Photoshop CC, and the use of  layers from Photoshop to generate assets (you can decide whether these will be png or jpeg, along with the appropriate sizes).

Edge Reflow

Reflow is a responsive design tool, which created appropriate CSS via media queries for breakpointed versions of a site. This allows the use to create different size versions of a site, which display elegantly on various devices.

EdgeCode

EdgeCode is a branded version of Brackets, and allows for quick changes of CSS and code, with the ability to preview immediately. It is a plugin for very rapid development. I liked it.

Premier and Audition

The session ended with demonstrations of Premier and Audition. I am pretty happy scraping up quick-and-dirty videos with ScreenFlow, but this is something I will look at eventually.

The morning was helpful. I did not win the iPad Mini that was given away, but was still happy to be there. The MakerBot examples were extremely impressive too.

 

Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States

Pearson has a published a very useful report on “Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States.” The accompanying infographic is shared below. The complete report is available at:

http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/changing_course_2012 

(and yes, they do talk about MOOCs in the report)

Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States

Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States

My MOOC Life (So Far): Part 4 – Course Cancelled

The Coursera MOOC I was taking (Fundamentals of Online Education) was recently cancelled. The reasons behind this (and the way in which the course was cancelled) have been instructive. I believe that this particular moment will feature heavily in future analysis of the MOOC movement.

On the 2nd February, I received this short email message from the instructor:

We want all students to have the highest quality learning experience. For this reason, we are temporarily suspending the “Fundamentals of Online Education: Planning and Application” course in order to make improvements. We apologize for any inconvenience that this may cause. We will inform you when the course will be reoffered.

Then I received this email update the next day:

Dear FOE students,

We were inspired to see the number of people who expressed an interest in seeing the class resume. There were some choices made in the initial design of the class that didn’t work out as well as we’d hoped. We are working to address these issues, and are reopening the discussion forums so that we can get feedback on how the class can be improved when it relaunches.

Thank you for your patience as we work to provide you with a great learning experience in the next version.

The FOE Course Staff

Fundamentals of Online Education: Planning and Application Course Team

I don’t believe either of those emails were honest. The messages did not accept the three major problems that this particular course had:

  1. The course was still under construction at time of launch.
  2. The group model was both poorly designed and implemented.
  3. There was no Quality Assurance in place before the course was offered.

The course was still under construction at time of launch

The first issue was inexcusable, particularly given the subject matter of the course. One of the fundamental tenets of good online course design is to have everything built before a course goes live. This does not preclude alterations and improvements (where justified) as a course is being taught, but this particular course still had “insert text here” content in the “About” pages. Going forward, Coursera needs to institute processes that ensure a course is ready before it launches.

The group model was both poorly designed and implemented

The second issue was interesting on several levels. The stated reason for assigning groups for students in the course was:

to make the discussions more manageable and to allow you to form networks with people in your own field and even with others not in your field. The idea was to create a world wide network of people who can help each other and to start building a world wide online learning community that will provide support and help.

However, MOOCs exhibit a significant attrition rate. In the first Coursera course I took these statistics were shared:

  • Number of students signed up: 45572
  • Number of students completing week 1: 1164
  • Number of students who took the Final: 5401
  • Number of certificates: 4595

To my mind, group membership would be significantly reduced by the end of the course (unless being part of the group successfully induced the majority of students to complete the course). I did not see this particular group model working. The instructor’s point about MOOC discussion being unmanageable is correct, and this is something that needs to be fixed, but the group method she implemented was not a viable solution.

Additionally, the methods in which students added themselves to groups were flawed. Initially this was through Google Docs, which does not scale to thousands of students (and resulted in records being deleted either inadvertently or to cause trouble). The later method was via discussion boards, in a way that was both inefficient and confusing. In neither option was there a way for students or Coursera to plan the composition of a group based upon any criteria (i.e. mixed skill-set,  learning style, location, primary language, etc.). Hopefully the instructional designers and developers at Coursera will look for a method in which the course technology can automatically assign groups in an intelligent fashion. This would be an opportunity to run some very interesting and productive research.

There was no Quality Assurance in place before the course was offered.

Lastly, I did not see any indication of Quality Assurance being run in this course. If there had been a process in place that that reviewed the course before launch, then this would have caught that fact that the course was still under construction, and this should have also highlighted problems with the groups model. This is a major issue for Coursera to address. Oversight needs to be in place to demonstrate that a MOOC offers a superlative educational experience to students. The publishing industry relies on editors, proof-readers, legal review, designers, and peer assessment to ensure that what reaches the reader is a quality product. A MOOC should be have the same level of oversight as a good publishing house.

UPDATE: Interesting commentary from Slate on the “course meltdown.” Worth searching on Twitter for #foemooc

 

My MOOC Life (So Far): Part 3 – Fundamentals of Online Education

I started my most recent MOOC today. This was another offering from Coursera, and focused on an area that fits into my work life very well. The course (Fundamentals of Online Education: Planning and Application) had a slightly rocky start, students were meant to add themselves to groups of 21 via a Google spreadsheet, but this resulted in inadvertent deletion of groups and a crashed server. The discussion boards were later used for students to add themselves to groups. I am in “Start LL” (I think).

I began the week by penning a quick introductory post, and then searched via a couple of keywords to see if there was anyone else in the course from work or Chicago. The introductory discussions are where I think Coursera could make a few improvements – it would be nice to apply a global profile more successfully for each subsequent course, and to create a groups/friends options which would allow for students to find contacts in each  new course.

My next step was to complete two learning styles questionnaires:

  1. VARK Learning Style Questionnaire
  2. Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire (ILS)

According to the VARK Questionnaire, I have a mild Read/Write learning preference:

  • Visual: 9
  • Aural: 5
  • Read/Write: 14
  • Kinesthetic: 8

Which suggests that I follow these strategies to study more effectively.

The results for the Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire (ILS) were as follows:

Learning Style Results

Learning Style Results

This suggests that I have largely moderate preferences for these learning styles:

  • Reflective (7)
  • Intuitive (3)
  • Visual (5)
  • Global (7)

Both these questionnaires were useful and interesting, and I think I will use them in the classes I teach. The course also provided a link to the “Are You Ready For An Online Class” page at Georgia Tech. It might be worthwhile coming up with a similar page more focussed on being in MOOC….

The course designers provided a background survey, which I completed. A couple of questions stood out for me:

Which one of the following component(s) do you think is important in an online course?

  • The navigation of the course website
  • The work load
  • Timely feedback from the instructor
  • Small group discussions
  • Group Projects
  • Other

Somewhat tellingly, assessment of learning was not a stated option.

If a 24 hour, 7 day a week help center staffed by qualified teaching assistants were available for this course, would you use it if you needed help?

I assume that this option would more more fully lead to a business model for Coursera.

Week 1

Week 1

Each Coursera course has exhibited a different personality, and the navigation for this course is very functional (but a tad ugly). The “Week 1” tab provides a table of the various requirements, due dates, and time for completion. This was a nice touch, although the introductory videos indicate that the course is fluid and subject to change.

Moving forward, I will be careful to temper my notes here and prevent the posting of anything that could be considered plagiarism or breaking the academic standards of Coursera.

My MOOC Life (So Far): Part 2

My Coursera Courses

So far I have taken three MOOCs, and I am currently taking another two (and I am enrolled in a Udacity course that I believe is study at your own pace – Introduction to Computer Science CS101, which I will look at way later in the year):

  • Information Security and Risk Management in Context
    • Ends 5th December, 2012
    • Taught via Coursera
  • Social Network Analysis
    • Ends 19th November, 2012
    • Taught via Coursera
  • Internet History, Technology, and Security
    • Completed – waiting for certificate
    • Taught via Coursera
  • Power Searching with Google
    • Completed – received certificate (image)
    • Taught via Google’s Course Builder
  • Instructional Ideas and Technology Tools for Online Success

My purpose in enrolling in these MOOCS has been twofold:

  1. To continue my education
  2. To investigate MOOCs
    • Is there a business model?
    • Do they “work?”
    • What instructional design strategies are employed?
    • How will they compete with traditional education?
    • Is assessment possible on a large scale
    • etc.

So here are some more observations…. (Part 1 can be found here)

Internet History, Technology, and Security

The instructor (Charles Severance) has been very good at communicating with students since the course has officially ended. There have been several email updates sent out to the group alerting us to the certificate status. This is good in of itself, but what is even better is that he recorded a “reflection / summary lecture” which he had planned to:

“talk about how the class went, what worked and how I would improve the class, and share some of the data about the class with you”

This is fantastic, and demonstrates what I find most powerful about the MOOCs – the way in which the large number of students combine with the open nature of the MOOC philosophy to rapidly iterate improvements (providing faculty, instructional designers, technologists, etc. are willing and prepared to make changes).

Coursera Student Map

Data on where the Coursera students came from

Chuck shared some data on where the students came from, which can be seen by following this link to Google Maps.

The reflection video shared some great data on the student population, but this data I found particularly interesting:

  • Number of students signed up: 45572
  • Number of students completing week 1: 1164
  • Number of students who took the Final: 5401
  • Number of certificates: 4595

Chuck then shared his thoughts on what went well, and what he would do differently. I don’t think he will mind me repeating this here given his adherance to openness and transparency:

Worked Well

  • Using Twitter as the way to contact me
  • Discussion tool is outstanding
  • Multi-take quizzes with automorphing questions
  • Lecture video format with me looking at the Cintiq
  • Discussion forums and their voting
  • Cognitive load from the forums to me was manageable
  • Mail to the class needed to come from me
  • Office hours as small focus groups to help me improve the course

Things He Would Do Differently

  • Better Welcome Lecture
  • How to use the software lecture from Coursera (i.e. like resources)
  • How and when to use the “flag” icon
  • How do Late Days work?????
  • Describe community communication guidelines – when we will delete a thread
  • Delete threads more often
  • Faster lecture translating
  • All writing assignments are extra credit (because this is an intro class)
  • I still don’t get reputation points and how I should use them
  • More student editable spaces
  • Better way to identify natural leaders in the community and give them ways to communicate broadly other than “+1 votes” in the discussion
  • Split lectures at week boundaries (oops)
  • Add a “breath/pause” during lecture recording to allow me to later decide where to put a question.
  • Come up with an extensive preview so people don’t register just to peek
  • Tell late entrants that after week 3 they will not likely get a certificate – perhaps even close registration – you can go on a wait list and see the materials but not take the quizzes
  • I would like to come up with a selfpaced version – but the software would need to be different

This really gets to why the course was so successful – a professor who felt passionate about making improvements to the course as it was being taught, and then applying longer-term changes for the future. He also was extremely approachable using Twitter, the discussion boards, and traveling office hours to communicate.

I was lucky enough to participate in the Chicago office hours, and found this to give me more of a connection to the course.

It gets even better – Chuck is intending to build a sequence of MOOC courses that build upon each other, and he is personally signing all certificates sent to him.

It has been a definite pleasure taking the course.

Social Network Analysis

This looks to be the more “hands-on” of the various MOOCs, with applications to install and data to process. I have some assignments to complete and need to dig in deeper. I am happy with the way the course is going, and know that this will stretch me.

Information Security and Risk Management in Context

There has been an undercurrent (and sometimes more than that) of dissatisfaction in the discussion boards the past week. The areas that several of my fellow students feel less than happy are:

  • Announcements that the videos cannot be downloaded.
  • Reuse of older classroom videos.
  • Promotion of the certificate programs ($1,025 for noncredit or $2,055 for graduate credit). Here the wording and frequency of this information seems to have rubbed people the wrong way.
  • A feeling that the course was rushed to meet a deadline, rather than waiting to release something more polished later in the year.
These are all fixable issues, and this is the first time this course has been taught, so it will be interesting to see what approaches are taken to meet these student comments. 

This is the first Coursera course where textbooks have been required/recommended. What I think would have worked better here would have been:

  • Selecting entirely digital required reading (rather than having to find and order a physical book).
  • Providing the required/recommended reading information earlier in the course.

However, I am finding the content in this course particularly relevant to my interests, and look forward to future weeks.